Skip to main content

Welcome to NN!

Naya' s YouTube Channel

Subscribe to my YouTube to make sure you don't miss out on my latest videos!

The Mice in Council - Summary and Analysis | Aesop Fables

 I narrated an Aesop Fable. You can find it here by pressing the link The Mice in Council.

The moral lesson is "It is one thing to say that something should be done, but it is quite a different matter to actually do it.". Many things appear feasible when speculating, but are found to be impracticable after some thinking.

a Square picture on top of which is written Aesop fables and in the Middle with bigger letters one can read the sentence: the mice in Council. On the bottom of the picture there are three sketches of mice. on the left there is a sketch a mouse, in blue color, standing. In the middle there are the heads of three little mice in blue color. And on the right a standing Mouse of dark purple color

Also one should not act, not before thinking at least, on the urges of people who present themselves as leaders urging others to do things that they themselves wouldn' t do. Those that judge that this or that should be done, will appear ridiculous when the question "who will do it" is asked and so the moral lesson of this fable could also be "let those who propose, be willing to perform". 

The Fable:

Once upon a time all the mice met together in council and discussed the best means of securing themselves against the attacks of the cat. After several suggestions had been debated, a mouse of some standing and experience got up and said, “I think I have hit upon a plan which will ensure our safety in the future, provided you approve and carry it out. It is that we should fasten a bell round the neck of our enemy the cat, which will by its tinkling warn us of her approach.” This proposal was warmly applauded, and it had been already decided to adopt it, when an old mouse got upon his feet and said, “I agree with you all that the plan before us is an admirable one. But may I ask who is going to bell the cat?”
The Mice then further debated who among them should be the one to execute the plan.
But there was no one found to do it.



Popular posts from this blog

The Frogs & The Well - Summary and Analysis | Aesop Fables

 This fable tells us the story of two frogs who had to abandon the marsh they were living at because it dried out. " Two frogs lived together in a marsh. But one hot summer the marsh dried up completely. So they left it to look for another place to live in." So they had to find another home. On their search they came upon a deep well. One of the two frogs considered the well a wonderful place to live in. "By and by they came to a deep well. One of them looked down into it and said to the other, “This looks like a nice cool place. Let's jump in and settle here.” " But his companion was wiser and said to his friend that they shouldn't make a hasty decision because " Supposing this well dried up like the marsh, how should we get out again?". The moral lesson of the fable is "Look twice before you jump", meaning that one should take the time and asses every aspect of a matter and also use past experiences, before making a decision that mig...

The Fable of King Log & King Stork: An Analysis of Power and Consequences | Aesop Fables

THIS IS A SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS  on the fable written by Walter Crane  called " KING LOG & KING STORK"  in his book THE  BABY’S  OWN  ÆSOP,  BEING THE FABLES CONDENSED IN RHYME  WITH PORTABLE MORALS.  The story is based on the well known as fable " The Frogs who wished for a King ", for which I've already posted a summary and analysis and you can read on the link above. The fable Summary The frogs request a king from Jove, hoping for a more dynamic leader than a log. - Jove sends them a Stork, who rules over them, but instead of benevolently leading, he devours the frogs, showcasing the consequences of desiring a powerful ruler. - The fable concludes with the lesson that having kings can lead to disastrous outcomes. Analysis The fable reflects on the dangers of authoritarian rule and the negative consequences of placing blind faith in a single individual to govern. - It questions the notion of kingship and challenges traditional pow...

"Two Rich Men", by Ivan Turgenev

 In Ivan Turgenev's short story "Two Rich Men," the author contrasts the philanthropy of the wealthy Rothschild with the selfless generosity of a poor peasant family. While Rothschild is praised for his financial contributions, the story highlights the humble actions of the peasant family who took in an orphan niece despite their own poverty. The family's willingness to sacrifice for the orphan emphasizes a deeper sense of compassion that surpasses the wealth of Rothschild. Listen to this short story: